USPTO serial 77192627
LATINO LAUGH FESTIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATINO LAUGH FESTIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Glendale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Don Thornburgh
466 FOOTHILL BLVD # 220LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, CA 91011-3518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Digital media, namely, CDs, DVDs and downloadable video files featuring comedy programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | (Based on Intent to Use) Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, video content and audio content via the Internet, wired and wireless networks to personal computers, wireless and handheld devices; broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and tv programs provided via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of comedy; entertainment, namely, a continuing comedy show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment in the nature of live entertainment events featuring stand-up comedy, music and variety | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |