USPTO serial 77192865
TEAM AWESOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAM AWESOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
PO Box 10589, SC
PO Box 10589, SC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Short trousers; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Dress shirts; Golf shirts; Knit shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts; Sports shirts; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Hat bands; Hats; Sweat bands; Sweat pants; Sweat suits; Sweatbands; Wrist bands; Jogging pants; Pants; Track pants; Waterproof jackets and pants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bach, Adam C.
- Other trademarks owned by Bach, Adam C.
- Other trademarks owned by Merriam Scott
- Other trademarks owned by Merriam Scott
- Other trademarks owned by Desantis, Matthew
- Other trademarks owned by Desantis, Matthew
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TEAM AWESOME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |