USPTO serial 77194091
PI KITCHEN + BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3921497Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2011
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PI KITCHEN + BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
Englewood, CO
Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
Englewood, CO
Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
Englewood, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Parent
CHRISTOPHER M. PARENT BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP410 17TH STREETSUITE 2200DENVER, CO 80202-4402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stonebridge Realty Advisors, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named PI KITCHEN + BAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |