Drawing for RED HAZE

USPTO serial 77194117

RED HAZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RED HAZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

Janet M. Garetto Nixon Peabody LLP300 S. Riverside Plaza, 16th floorChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 25, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 25, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 25, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance