Drawing for PERFECTION OF MENTHOL

USPTO serial 77194356

PERFECTION OF MENTHOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359452Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTION OF MENTHOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

Amy B. Berge Greenebaum Doll & McDonald PLLC3500 National City Tower101 South Fifth StreetLouisville, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco products, namely, cigarettesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jan 25, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 25, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 25, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance