USPTO serial 77194584
KARMAKISSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3629304Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KARMAKISSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAIPEI CITY 114, TW
Taipei, TW
Taipei, TW
Taipei, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato RoadSuite 310Fairfax, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; beverages made of tea; coffee; coffee based beverages containing milk; ice cream; salt; soy sauce; cooking or flavoring sauce; black and dark vinegar; vinegar; seasonings, spices and flavorings for food; sugar; natural sweeteners; honey; royal jelly for food purposes; molasses and maple syrups; chewing gum; candy mints, non-medicated lozenges and candy; rice crackers; snack mixes consisting of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; biscuits; cakes; breads; sandwiches; puddings; pies; dumplings; buns; spring rolls; egg rolls, egg dumplings; rice; processed wheat; rolled oats; flour; processed grains; pearl-like balls consisting of food starches made from cassava, tapioca, taro and/or sweet potatoes; sago, tapioca, pearl tapioca; glutinous rice; packaged meals consisting of rice; instant noodles; packaged meals consisting of noodles or pastas; dumplings; noodles; rice noodles; spring roll skins and wrappers; dough; yeasts; thickening agents for cooking or making foodstuff; flavored vinegar, all of the foregoing excluding chocolate candies, goods containing chocolate or cocoa, and goods categorized by chocolate or cocoa flavor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 23, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPANION FOODS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Ever Companion Food Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Ever Companion Food Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Ever Companion Food Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KARMAKISSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |