USPTO serial 77195058
BIGO'S BAR & GRILL PA'COMER TACOS CON ESTILO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4019700Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2011
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIGO'S BAR & GRILL PA'COMER TACOS CON ESTILO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Tamaulipas, MX
Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Tamaulipas, MX
Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Tamaulipas, MX
Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Erenburg
ANNA ERENBURG Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLPOne World Financial CenterNEW YORK, NY 10281UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services; carry-out food services; serving of food and drinks/beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Operadora Internacional de Franquicias del Noreste, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BIGO'S BAR & GRILL PA'COMER TACOS CON ESTILO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |