USPTO serial 77195137
UNIVERGE UBIQUITOUS WORKPLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIVERGE UBIQUITOUS WORKPLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.SUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; networking hardware for wireless communications; network apparatus, namely, computers, computer servers, telephones, asynchronous transfer mode switches, private branch exchanges, electrical switches, fiber optic cables, routers, transmitters, multiplexers, modems, amplifiers, hubs and bus; networking software for wireless communications and connectivity; computer software for establishing, enabling, monitoring, and managing wireless communications and connectivity between wireless devices and communications networks; computer software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks and telephony systems; computer software for use in controlling and managing computers, computer servers, telephones, asynchronous transfer mode switches, private branch exchanges, electrical switches, fiber optic cables, routers, transmitters, multiplexers, modems, amplifiers, hubs and bus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical computer consulting services and technical consultation for computer programming and computer hardware; design of computer hardware, computer software, web sites and computer network system for others; customization of computer hardware and software; integration of computer systems and networks; providing others with information in the field of computer hardware and computer software; consulting services in the fields of computer network support, the use and operation of computer software, systems analysis and integration, computer security and the planning, design, and optimization of computer network systems; maintenance and updating of computer software and web sites; computer network systems analysis; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, in person and local and global computer information networks; providing temporary use of non-downloadable database management computer software programs via the global information networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a NEC Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nippon Denki Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a NEC Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UNIVERGE UBIQUITOUS WORKPLACE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |