USPTO serial 77195997
E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3582147Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ESSEN, DE
ESSEN, DE
ESSEN, DE
Dortmund, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Harvey
IAN K. BOYD HARVEY SISKIND LLP4 EMBARCADERO CENTER39TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological research and design services; Industrial analysis and research services in the fields of science and technology; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Technical consultancy in relation to development of technologies and technical components for food; technical consultancy in relation to development and implementation of technologies and technical components for food and beverage processing and producing; technical consultancy in relation to technical research in the field of food and beverages; technical consultancy in relation to processes for leaching and detoxification; technical consultancy in relation to silicon compounds; technical consultancy in relation to catalysts; technical consultancy in relation to electronics; technical consultancy in relation to rubbers and polymers; technical consultancy in relation to leaching and detoxification of cyanide; technical consultancy in relation to the field of environmental science, engineering services and design for others in the field of environmental engineering, designing and testing of new environmentally friendly products for others; technical consultancy in relation to research services relating to foods and dietary supplements; technical consultancy in relation to how to make products and processes environmentally sound; Providing of technical surveys; Material testing; Performing chemical and physical analysis of waste and residue from waste incineration plants, power plants or water treatment plants; Architectural services; Services of chemists; Engineering services; Medical, bacteriological or chemical laboratories; Services of physicists; and computer programming for data processing; Structural and civil engineering; water engineering; timber engineering | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG
- Other trademarks owned by LG Verwaltungs, GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |