USPTO serial 77196178
SONOPATHY (IN OTHER LANGUAGES: SONOPATHI, SONOPATHIE)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONOPATHY (IN OTHER LANGUAGES: SONOPATHI, SONOPATHIE)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; Apparatus for transmitting and reproducing sound or images; Audio electronic components, namely, surround sound systems; Cables and fibres for the transmission of sounds and images; Central processing units for processing information, data, sound or images; Computer programs for editing images, sound and video; Computer software to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; Downloadable musical sound recordings; Echo sounding devices; Electronic effect pedals for use with sound amplifiers; Electronic products for the manipulation of the frequency, time, and amplitude characteristics of audio signals, namely, audio processors; Electronic sound mixing, processing and synthesizing apparatus; Electronic testing equipment, namely, sound level meters; Musical sound recordings; Personal headphones for use with sound transmitting systems; Radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials; Radio receivers and monitors for reproduction of sound and signals; Radio-frequency controlled locks; Recording and playing devices for sound and image carriers; Resonators; Software to control and improve audio equipment sound quality; Sound amplifiers; Sound and video recording and playback machines; Sound mixers with integrated amplifiers; Sound recorded magnetic cards, sheets and tapes; Sound recording apparatus; Sound recording apparatus and instruments; Sound recordings featuring The detection, use, recording, storage, delivery, playing, mixing, transmission, stimulation, treatment and/or manipulation of frequencies in all forms and via all mediums.; Frequency converters; Radio frequency identification (RFID) tags; Radio frequency identification tag readers; Abdominal belt containing built-in speakers for purposes of transmitting music/sounds/educational material to a fetus and a built-in pockets in which to carry audio transmitters; Blank CD-ROMs for sound or video recording; Blank integrated circuit cards for recording, transmitting, and reproducing sound and images in mobile telephone services; Electronic frequency converters for high velocity electro motors; Electronic sound pickup for guitars and basses; Sound cards; Sound filters made of cloth, for radio apparatus; Sound level meters; Sound mixers; Computer software, namely, an application allowing sales and field service employees to update and receive data stored in an enterprise's computer databases in real time, using a mobile device, with full telephony integration with the telephone and/or software features of the mobile device.; Customer self service electronic checkout station for point of sale; Optical frequency metrology devices | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2007 |
| 038 | Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Satellite, cable, network transmission of sounds, images, signals and data; Transmission of data, sound and images by satellite; Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; Transmission of sound, video and information; Rental of access time to global computer networks; Rental of equipment for telecommunications; Rental of teleprocessing and computer communication apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 2007 |
| 041 | Sound recording studios; Editing or recording of sounds and images; Production of sound and music video recordings; Rental of records or sound-recorded magnetic tapes; Rental of sound recordings; Rental of image-recorded magnetic tapes; Rental of musical instruments; Rental of phonographic and music recordings; Rental of tape recording equipment | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emond, Stephen
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SONOPATHY (IN OTHER LANGUAGES: SONOPATHI, SONOPATHIE)
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |