CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MONKEY DUNKS

USPTO serial 77196404

MONKEY DUNKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONKEY DUNKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ms. Emily Campbell, ESQ

Ms. Emily Campbell, ESQ The Campbell Firm PLLC5th Floor80 Broad StreetNew York, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Packaged food, namely, dips, namely, bean dip, dairy based dips, guacamole and hummus; Packaged food, namely, spreads, namely, cheese spreads, dairy-based spreads, fruit-based spreads, vegetable-based spreads, fruit topping, bruschetta toppings and tapenadesACTIVE—
030Packaged food, namely, salsa, sauces and spreads, namely, dipping sauces, fruit couli, fruit sauces, chutney, ready-made sauces, spaghetti sauce, tomato sauce, cheese sauce, ketchup, mustard, salad dressings, chocolate topping and topping syrupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Sep 2, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance