Drawing for A FINE MESS

USPTO serial 77197041

A FINE MESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A FINE MESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Alumit, Esq.

JOHN ALUMIT, ESQ. PATEL & ALUMIT, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436-1711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, primarily for young people, namely, socks, bras, gloves, footwear, shoes, thongs, slippers, mukluks, beanies, baseball caps, beretsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 22, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 22, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 6, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Oct 15, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 4, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 4, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 13, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 13, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 13, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jun 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance