Drawing for MEMBER ACCESS PLUS

USPTO serial 77197184

MEMBER ACCESS PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEMBER ACCESS PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerry L. Watts

JERRY L. WATTS PAGE, SCRANTOM, SPROUSE, TUCKER & FORD, PC1111 BAY AVENUEPOST OFFICE BOX 1199COLUMBUS, GA 31902-1199

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035billing and accounting servicesACTIVEJan 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 10, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 24, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 14, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 14, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 14, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance