Drawing for BETTER AS ONE

USPTO serial 77197212

BETTER AS ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER AS ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica L. Dias

Monica L. Dias Frost Brown Todd LLC3300 Great American Tower, 301 E. 4th StCincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance telephone transmission services; telephone communication services, and associated voice mail and custom calling features, namely, three way calling, speed dialing, call forwarding, call return, call waiting, caller ID; wireless telecommunication services, namely, wireless electronic transmission of messages, data, sound, text, image messages, video and documents via a wireless global computer communications network, wireless television and wireless telecommunications networks; telecommunications gateway services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network; and providing high-speed Internet access services, providing electronic mail services; electronic messaging store and forward servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 31, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 15, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 15, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2007TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Aug 8, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance