Drawing for EXPECT MORE

USPTO serial 77197394

EXPECT MORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EXPECT MORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pollie Gautsch

POLLIE GAUTSCH G&A LEGAL A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION2033 SAN ELIJO AVENUE#201CARDIFF, CA 92007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 18, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 18, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 21, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance