USPTO serial 77198063
SOULAUGHABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOULAUGHABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allen Hyman, Esq.
ALLEN HYMAN, ESQ. LAW OFFICES OF ALLEN HYMAN10737 RIVERSIDE DRNORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA 91602-2324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, records and DVDs featuring live comedy, music and dance performances based upon gospel and inspirational music | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a continuing television show featuring comedy, music and dance based upon gospel and inspirational music; presentation of live show performances featuring comedy, music and dance based upon gospel and inspirational music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lataillade Entertainment, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lataillade Entertainment, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SOULAUGHABLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |