USPTO serial 77198132
FOR ESMÉ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOR ESMÉ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver B.C., CA
Vancouver B.C., CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Athletic bags; Beach bags; Handbags; Knapsacks; Luggage; Purses; Shoulder bags; Traveling bags; Trunks; Clutch bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |