USPTO serial 77198274
DESIGN FOR REMANUFACTURING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DESIGN FOR REMANUFACTURING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan C. Chaires
SUSAN C. CHAIRES CHAIRES & ASSOCIATES1806 New Hampshire Avenue NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the public awareness of the need and advantage of the design and manufacture of goods in the furniture, automotive, construction, mining, computer and telephone industries that are capable of safe and efficient remanufacturing, rebuilding and restoration | ACTIVE | Sep 18, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Automotive Parts Remanufacturers Association
- Other trademarks owned by Automotive Parts Remanufacturers Association
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named DESIGN FOR REMANUFACTURING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 4, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |