USPTO serial 77198554
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauri S. Thompson, Esq.
LAURI S. THOMPSON, ESQ. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 500NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169-0996UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cologne, perfumes, non-medicated skin care preparations; skin-care products, namely, facial lotion, bath and shower gels, bath oils, bath salts, bath soaps, body scrubs, body lotion, hand and nail lotion; aromatherapy products; sunscreens, suntan lotions; hair shampoo and conditioner, hair gel, hair sculpting gel, hair pomades, hair styling preparations; body powder; lip gloss, lip balm, shaving balm; cosmetics, namely, make-up products for the face and body, nail polish remover, pre-moistened eye wipes for cosmetic purposes, skin and facial cleanser, cosmetic self tanning preparations, deodorant for personal use, astringent for cosmetic purposes, and pre-moistened packed towelettes containing astringent for cosmetic use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |