CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TELESLIDE

USPTO serial 77198634

TELESLIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELESLIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad R. Maurer

Brad R. Maurer Baker & Daniels LLP300 North Meridian StreetSuite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012structural slide-out systems for recreational vehicles, namely, slidable compartments for expanding the interior space of motor homesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 11, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 7, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance