Drawing for ME! CREATED FOR THE HORSE

USPTO serial 77199144

ME! CREATED FOR THE HORSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ME! CREATED FOR THE HORSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Kosmal McCart

RACHEL KOSMAL MCCART EQUINE LEGAL SOLUTIONS, INC.24150 S HIGHLAND CREST DRBEAVERCREEK, OR 97004-9716UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Pet shampoo; Shampoo-conditioners; Shampoos; Deodorizers for pets; Non-medicated grooming preparations for horses and dogs, namely, shampoo, conditioner, detangler, shine products and stain remover; Pet stain removers; Conditioners; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, horse and dog shampoo, conditioner, detangler, shine products and stain remover; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair rinses; Skin conditioners; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair creams; Hair emollients; Hair gel; Hair gels; Hair lotions; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Lotions for horse and dog hair; Oils for hair conditioningACTIVEAug 1, 2006
005Herbal anti-itch and sore skin ointment for petsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance