Drawing for WAVE

USPTO serial 77199157

WAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine Mennenga

CATHERINE MENNENGA GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TURNPIKECORPORATE TRADEMARK OPERATIONFAIRFIELD, CT 06828-0001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory equipment, namely, mixers for mixing liquids; Disposable plastic bioreactors for cell culturing; Bioreactors for cell culturing; Laboratory equipment and supplies, namely, laboratory tube fusers, thermometers, plastic tubes, and plastic bags; Heat sealing machines for sealing plastic tubes that are used in the laboratory, pharmaceutical, medical and biomedical fields; Plastic bags for use in the laboratory for cell culturingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 23, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance