USPTO serial 77199444
CHASING ZERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHASING ZERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Dreitler
Joseph R. Dreitler Bricker & Eckler, LLP100 South Third StreetColumbus, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Product development and research for others in the field of radiopharmaceuticals; computer services, namely, consulting with drug stores and pharmacies about computer systems designed to facilitate product ordering, inventory management, cost accounting, patient profiles, third party bill and the production of management reports | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical consulting services, namely, recommending to medical facilities medical supplies and products to be used for specific types of surgery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinal Health Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cardinal Health Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CAREFUSION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CHASING ZERO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |