USPTO serial 77199874
NETICZANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETICZANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kanika Radhakrishnan
KANIKA RADHAKRISHNAN EVERGREEN VALLEY LAW GROUP2670 S WHITE RD STE 275SAN JOSE, CA 95148-2087UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic, cinematographic, optical, scientific and educational computer software, namely, software for technology transfer and training in the field of information technology and computer based education; compiler software; communications software for connecting network users and global computer networks; graphical user interface software; computer graphics software; computer applications software for desktop computers; software development tools and software platforms for creating and authoring content for computer based education; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; blank magnetic data carriers; blank record discs; calculators; data processors and data processing equipment, namely, IBM PC compatible computers; computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |