USPTO serial 77200327
EXTREEM SQUEEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXTREEM SQUEEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit and vegetable desserts in the nature of fruit and vegetable salads, candied fruit snacks, dried fruit snacks, fruit-based snacks; frozen fruits and vegetables; congealed fruits and vegetables, namely, processed fruits and vegetables; fruit preserves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Fruit deserts, namely, fruit pies, fruit cobblers; frozen confections; congealed confections, namely, confectionery fruit jellies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EXTREEM SQUEEZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |