USPTO serial 77200361
EXTREEM FREEZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3862375Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2010
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXTREEM FREEZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit and vegetable desserts in the nature of fruit and vegetable salads, candied fruit snacks, dried fruit snacks, fruit-based snacks; frozen fruit and vegetables; congealed fruits and vegetables, namely, processed fruit and vegetables; fruit-based organic food bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Fruit desserts, namely, fruit pies, fruit cobblers; frozen confections made primarily from apples, peaches, mangoes, pears, pineapples, oranges, tangerines, grapes, grapefruits, watermelons, honeydew, cantaloupes, bananas, raspberries, blueberries, strawberries, blackberries, cherries, passionfruits, plums, cranberries, pomegranates, lemons, limes, mandarins, coconuts, carrots, turnips, beets, pumpkins, tomatoes, lentils, soybeans, leaks, rhubarbs, ginger, milk and yogurt; congealed confections, namely confectionery fruit jellies made primarily from apples, peaches, mangoes, pears, pineapples, oranges, tangerines, grapes, grapefruits, watermelons, honeydew, cantaloupes, bananas, raspberries, blueberries, strawberries, blackberries, cherries, passionfruits, plums, cranberries, pomegranates, lemons, limes, mandarins, coconuts, carrots, turnips, beets, pumpkins, tomatoes, lentils, soybeans, leaks, rhubarbs, ginger, milk and yogurt; fruit desserts, namely, fruit ice bars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LEAHY ORCHARDS INC./LES VERGERS LEAHY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EXTREEM FREEZZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |