Drawing for SOUVLAKI HUT FAMOUS GREEK SANDWICHES

USPTO serial 77200468

SOUVLAKI HUT FAMOUS GREEK SANDWICHES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUVLAKI HUT FAMOUS GREEK SANDWICHES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP2300 N Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurants featuring eat-in, take-out, and delivery serviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 12, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 9, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 26, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 25, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance