Drawing for ROYAL D

USPTO serial 77200531

ROYAL D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Dweck, Esq.

JEFFREY DWECK, ESQ. THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S. DWECK, P.C.100 W 33RD ST STE 1017NEW YORK, NY 10001-2914UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Collars for pets; Garments for pets; Pet clothing; Pet collar accessories, namely, bows and charms; Diapers for dogs; Dog apparel; Dog clothing; Dog collars; Dog leashes; Dog parkas; Dog shoes; Rawhide chews for dogs; Animal carriers; Animal harnesses; Animal leashes; Clothing for animals; Feed bags for animals; Leggings for animals; Disposable pet diapers; Pet accessories, namely, canvas, vinyl and leather pouches for holding disposable bags to place pet waste inACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance