USPTO serial 77200710
SISTER BLUE JEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SISTER BLUE JEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
TRISHA A. DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 702VANCOUVER; BRITISH COLUMB, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's and teen's clothing, namely, casual wear namely jeans, cargo pants, khaki pants, dresses, skirts, shirts, sports shirts and tank tops; business casual wear namely jeans, khaki pants, dress pants, dresses, skirts, jackets, cardigans, blouses; business wear namely dress pants, dresses, skirts, jackets, blouses and suits; evening wear namely dress pants, dresses, skirts, jackets, cardigans, camisoles and blouses; outdoor wear namely coats and jackets; beach wear; active wear namely stretch pants, stretch shorts, stretch tops, stretch jackets, sweat pants, sweat shirts and kangaroo jackets; lounge wear; sleep wear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, catalogue services and internet web site services featuring the sale of women's and teen's clothing, namely casual wear, business casual wear, business wear, evening wear, outdoor wear, beach wear, active wear, lounge wear and sleep wear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |