USPTO serial 77200858
DEALS THAT HEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEALS THAT HEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Victoria, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Thompson
Douglas B. Thompson Thompson Cooper LLPSuite 201, 1007 Fort StreetVictoria, V8V3K5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging and start-up companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |