Drawing for ADNETWORK ADVISOR

USPTO serial 77201284

ADNETWORK ADVISOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADNETWORK ADVISOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Pasulka

KATHLEEN A. PASULKA PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4496UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information services, namely, providing information about the purchasing habits of particular consumers and organizationsACTIVE—
036Information services, namely, providing financial information describing particular consumers and organizationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 24, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 9, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 9, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 29, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 5, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 15, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 15, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance