Drawing for MUSTANG

USPTO serial 77201372

MUSTANG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MUSTANG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, spectacle cases, sunglasses, frames for spectacles and sunglasses, contact lens and contact lens cases, eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer and spectacle chainsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 11, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 11, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 24, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance