USPTO serial 77201630
VENTED WIDE MOUTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3545490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2008
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VENTED WIDE MOUTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
WILMINGTON, DE
Golden, CO
DENVER, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lew Hansen
Lew Hansen Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILLERCOORS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MILLERCOORS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coors Global Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COORS BREWING COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named VENTED WIDE MOUTH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |