USPTO serial 77201840
MEXBEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXBEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shawn K. Look
Shawn K Look Look Law Firm PLLCPO Box 364Eudora, AR 71640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Jellies, meat and dry meat, fish, pork and game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked vegetables, frozen, pickled and canned cut vegetables, jams, compotes, milk and milk products, namely, half and half, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, guacamole, dried, processed, refried and baked beans, vegetable oils and fats, and candied fruits and shelled peanuts, processed peppers and pepper oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces, hot sauces, dried peppers for use as seasoning, spices, flavored and sweetened gelatins, candy, tea, tea-based beverages with fruit flavorings, Mexican style foods, namely, seasonings, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, flour preparations made from cereals, bread, pastries, honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, spices, pizzas, tacos, burritos, tostados, tortillas, puffed corn, cheese flavored curls, cheese flavored balls, breakfast cereals, ice cream, ice cream drinks, ice cream substitutes, ice cream cones, coffee, tea, cocoa, bases for making milkshakes, coffee based beverages containing milk, grain or chicory based coffee substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, namely, mineral water, aerated waters, coffee flavored soft drinks, concentrates, powders and syrups for making soft drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, soft drinks flavored with tea, vegetable and fruit juices, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Garduno-Lomelin, Bernardo
- Other trademarks owned by Garduno-Lomelin, Bernardo
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MEXBEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |