Drawing for PIPEWORKS

USPTO serial 77202198

PIPEWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIPEWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher R. Kinkade

Christopher R. Kinkade Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox DriveBuilding 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and programs for database management, excluding computer game and video game software, and user and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2008CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance