Drawing for THE WORLD DRUG BANK

USPTO serial 77202254

THE WORLD DRUG BANK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WORLD DRUG BANK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Stanwyck

STEVEN J. STANWYCK THE STANWYCK FIRM225 MONTANA AVESUITE 103SANTA MONICA, CA 90403-1132

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing promotional marketing services to businesses in the field of pharmaceutical drugsACTIVE—
036Philanthropic services concerning monetary donations for the purposes of promoting access to pharmaceutical drugs on a global basisACTIVE—
044Charitable services, namely, providing pharmaceutical drugs to needy people on a global basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 21, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance