Drawing for PHENOMEN-ALL

USPTO serial 77202770

PHENOMEN-ALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHENOMEN-ALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori K. Hall

LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP1 MAIN STREET WESTHAMILTON; ONTARIO, L8P4Z5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair removal and skin care products including sugar paste, drying powder, skin cleanser, tonic hydrating lotion, almond oil and skin care spritzACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 16, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 16, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance