Drawing for MAXCL

USPTO serial 77203020

MAXCL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXCL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LANE FOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036fraternal services, namely, life insurance underwritingACTIVEAug 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 18, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 13, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
May 2, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 7, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 7, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 8, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 8, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 7, 2008EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance