Drawing for CLEAN NOT DIRTY DANCING

USPTO serial 77203162

CLEAN NOT DIRTY DANCING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3517437Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN NOT DIRTY DANCING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Evert

LUCKY 11 INC12798 DAIMLER DRIVEFRISCO, TX 75034UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bath gel; Bubble bath; Shower gelSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 4, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 4, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 5, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 2, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 13, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance