USPTO serial 77203648
LE GOURMET CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3712497Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2009
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LE GOURMET CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chillicothe, OH
Chillicothe, OH
Chillicothe, OH
CHILLICOTHE, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Hammond
KAREN K. HAMMOND PORTER WRIGHT MORRIS & ARTHUR LLP41 SOUTH HIGH STREETSTE 2800COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6194Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, forks, knives and spoons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2005 |
| 021 | Flower baskets, fitted picnic baskets, steamer baskets, wastepaper baskets and baskets made of wicker; cookware, namely, pots, pans, tea kettles, coffee pots not of precious metal, carving boards, wood chopping blocks; bakeware; chocolate molds; beverage glassware; home bar accessories, namely, beverage stirrers, decanters, cocktail shakers, wine bottle cradles and buckets, carafes, measuring tumblers and plastic coasters; china ornaments; small domestic utensils, namely, pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks, food brushes for cleaning foodstuffs, namely, fruits and vegetables, basting brushes, hand operated coffee grinders, coffee measures for domestic use, food containers, salad and food mixing bowls, bread boxes, bread boards; vegetable mashers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Kitchen textiles, namely, towels, napkins and tablecloths | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store and on-line retail store services featuring kitchenwares and housewares | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Kitchen Collection, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Kitchen Collection, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Kitchen Collection, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE KITCHEN COLLECTION, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LE GOURMET CHEF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |