Drawing for REDDY FLAME

USPTO serial 77203962

REDDY FLAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDDY FLAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory Golla

GREGORY GOLLA MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Graduated rulers, calculatorsACTIVE—
016Office items, namely, pens, staplers, envelope openers, ungraduated rulers, document portfolios, and stationery-type portfoliosACTIVE—
018Duffel bags, and tote bags, briefcases, briefcase-type portfoliosACTIVE—
021Mugs; sport bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
024Golf towelsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, caps, hats, shirts, golf shirts, wind shirts, long sleeve twill shirts, pullovers, polo shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, boxer shorts, neckties, vests, jackets, and baby bibs not made of paperACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely, golf balls, and protective golf club covers; balls for games with sound and light featuresACTIVE—
041Development and dissemination of educational materials for others in the field of energy and natural resource consumption and conservationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2009CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2008EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance