USPTO serial 77204300
ULTRACORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRACORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monty L. Ross
MONTY L. ROSS LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flexible composite plastic and metal water connector hoses having a polymeric liner sheathed with braided metal wire for connecting a potable water supply source to sanitary appliances, namely, faucets, toilet tanks, dishwashers, water heaters and clothes washing machines | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |