USPTO serial 77204352
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL W. GOLTRY
MICHAEL W. GOLTRY PARSONS & GOLTRY4000 N. CENTRAL AVE., SUITE 1220PHOENIX, AZ 85012-3502UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Assisting users in offering goods for sale, offering services for sale, purchasing the goods of others, and purchasing the services of others, namely, providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for purchasing goods, providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for purchasing services, providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for selling goods, providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for selling services, providing online forums for communication of messages among users concerning the purchase or sale of goods and services, providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for selling and purchasing goods, and providing online forums for the communication of messages among users concerning terms for selling and purchasing services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |