USPTO serial 77205184
LIBERTIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIBERTIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | liqueurs; distilled spirits; wines; cream liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |