Drawing for ONE CHANGE AT A TIME

USPTO serial 77205234

ONE CHANGE AT A TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE CHANGE AT A TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven E. Shapiro

STEVEN E. SHAPIRO CONSUMER HEALTHCARE ADVANTAGE5777 W CENTURY BLVD STE 1150LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-9022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing wellness programs for the prevention of chronic illness, namely, providing diet, nutrition and exercise regimes, monitoring participant progress with respect to diet, nutrition and exercise regimes and providing information with respect to the subjects of diet, nutrition, disease, medication, prevention of chronic illness and the physiological impact of illnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2009UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Nov 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 21, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 21, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance