USPTO serial 77205630
SHIELD GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIELD GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Lee Yamato
LORI LEE YAMATO KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, FOURTEENTH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKING SAUCEPANS; ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS; ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS; ELECTRIC IRON PANS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC FRYING PANS MADE OF IRON; ELECTRIC COOKING UTENSILS, NAMELY, BREAD TOASTERS, ELECTRIC COOKING POTS, ELECTRIC COOKING POT SETS, ELECTRIC RICE COOKING POTS; ELECTRIC GRIDDLES; COOKING APPLIANCES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC GRILLS; COOKING APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC COOKING OVENS, ELECTRIC COOKING STOVES, MICROWAVE OVENS; ELECTRIC SLOW COOKERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | PANS; SAUCEPANS; COOKING POT SETS; STEW-PANS; CAULDRONS; GLUE POTS; NON-STICK PANS; COOKING POTS; FRYING PANS; NON-ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS; NON-ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS; IRON PANS; NON-ELECTRIC COOKING UTENSILS, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC RICE COOKING POTS, COOKING STEAMERS; COOKING UTENSILS, NAMELY, GRILLS; KITCHEN UTENSILS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, NAMELY, GRATERS, SIEVES, SPATULAS; NON-ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS; HOT POTS NOT ELECTRICALLY HEATED; KITCHEN CONTAINERS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chin, Raymond Yuen Keung
- Other trademarks owned by Chin, Raymond Yuen Keung
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SHIELD GUARD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |