USPTO serial 77206197
LASH OUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASH OUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Tran
John D. Tran BUUS, KIM, KUO & TRAN, LLP.4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 590Newport Beach, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear for men and women; Footwear for women; Women's shoes; Bathing costumes for women; Coats for men and women; Leotards and tights for women, men and children of nylon, cotton or other textile fibers; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Men's suits, women's suits; Sweaters; Turtleneck sweaters; V-neck sweaters; Women's underwear; Ankle socks; Anklets; Anti-perspirant socks; Socks; Socks and stockings; Dresses; Dressing gowns; Evening dresses; Skirts and dresses; Bath slippers; Disposable slippers; Leather slippers; Slipper soles; Slippers; Belts; Belts made of leather; Fabric belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |