USPTO serial 77206908
MARCONI BROADCASTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARCONI BROADCASTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. A. Earley III
JOHN F. A. EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEYP.O. BOX 750VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Radio broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |