USPTO serial 77208158
WATERBORN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATERBORN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2132 WT Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations, soaps, and detergents for laundry use and dishwasher use; laundry additives, namely, laundry starch, laundry bleach, laundry blueing, laundry pre-soak and fabric softeners; laundry detergent; laundry preparations for dry cleaners, namely, dry cleaning solvents, dry cleaning fluids and spot removers; carpet cleaners; carpet shampoos; polishing preparations for kitchen and glassware; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive liquids, creams, gels and powders; decalcifying and descaling preparations for household cleaning use; stain removers; all aforementioned goods being with or without a disinfectant component; perfuming preparations for the air, namely, room fragrances, room perfume sprays; preparations for perfuming or fragrancing the air, namely, incense, incense cones, incense sticks, incense sachets, incense sprays, essential oils, potpourri and room perfume sprays; deodorants for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Sanitary sterilizing preparations; antiseptic preparations; anti-bacterial preparations; all purpose disinfecting preparations; sanitizing wipes; wipes, cloths and tissues impregnated with a disinfectant, anti-bacterial or antiseptic products for household use; antibacterial cleaners; antibacterial spray; insecticides; insect repellents; pesticides; preparations for killing vermin; anti-allergy medications and sprays; all-purpose disinfectants; germicides; fungicides; herbicides; preparations for killing weeds; air freshening preparations; air purifying preparations in the nature of air deodorizers; preparations for perfuming or fragrancing the air, namely, room air fresheners; household and room deodorants; odor neutralizing preparations for use on carpets, textiles, soft furniture, household surfaces and in the air; preparations and substances for neutralizing, controlling or reducing allergens delivered via spray and aerosol; herbal preparations for medicinal use, namely, herbal teas for medicinal purposes and medicinal herbal extracts for medical purposes; transdermal pads or patches impregnated with or containing substances for the relief of symptoms of colds and influenza; decongestants; preparations for dispersing decongestants, namely, decongestant capsules and nasal sprays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |