USPTO serial 77209205
DR. B. HERMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. B. HERMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Dorvee,
STEPHEN M. DORVEE, ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLPSUITE 2100171 17TH STREET, NWATLANTA, GA 30363Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Adhesives for use in the manufacture of surgical bandages | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | (Based on 44(e)) Adhesive for surgical bandages, namely, adhesive for bandages for skin wounds; Medical adhesives for binding wounds; First aid kits; Material for dressing found in first aid kits in vehicles, namely, gauze for dressings, cotton for medical purposes, cotton wool for medical purposes, burn dressings, wound dressings, surgical dressings, self adhesive dressings; dressing material, namely, gauze for dressings, cotton for medical purposes, cotton wool for medical purposes; plaster, namely, sticking plasters for medical use, medical plasters, corn plaster; disinfectant, namely, disinfectants for medical instruments, all purpose disinfectants, disinfectants for sanitary purposes, disinfectants for hygienic purposes, medical cleansers for skin and wounds; bandages for dressings; dressings, namely, burn dressings, wound dressings, surgical dressings, self adhesive dressings; absorbent cotton, namely, cotton sticks for medical purposes, cotton swabs for medical purposes; cotton for medical purposes, cotton wool for medical purposes; dressing packages, namely, burn dressings, wound dressings, surgical dressings, self adhesive dressings; dressing cloths, namely, gauze for dressings; first aid sterile wound bandage, namely, adhesive bandages, bandages for dressings, bandages for skin wounds, surgical bandages; triangular bandage, namely, triangular bandages for skin wounds, triangular bandages for dressings, triangular adhesive bandages, triangular surgical bandages; sanitation preparation for medical purposes, namely, disinfectants for medical instruments, sanitary preparations for medical use, medical cleansers for skin and wounds, disinfectants for sanitary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Emergency blankets, namely, fire blankets, specially designed blankets for use in emergency, disaster or survival situations | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | (Based on 44(e)) Dressing tools, namely, surgical scissors, medical scissors specifically designed for use with medical dressings and bandages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sinamotive Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sinamotive Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DR. B. HERMANN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |